Back to search
The question

Is the ablution of one who intended to perform ablution (wudu'), then took a ritual bath (ghusl) without performing wudu', valid?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

If the is not obligatory (such as ghusl for Eid or for cooling down), then it does not suffice for wudu' unless one has the intention of wudu'. The person performing ghusl must be careful not to touch his private parts, and to observe the order of the wudu' limbs according to those who deem it obligatory. However, if the ghusl is obligatory (such as ghusl from or menstruation), then it suffices for wudu', because the intention to remove the major ritual impurity is sufficient for the minor one, and this is an agreed-upon opinion.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
88527
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy