Was the practice of some of the Salaf, such as Ahmad, of acting upon weak hadiths based on a concept of "weak" that differs from the currently prevalent understanding?
The discourse of the Hanbalis is the authoritative source for understanding the principles of Imam Ahmad's . They hold that Ahmad ibn Hanbal would accept mursal and weak if there was nothing to contradict them, preferring this over (analogical reasoning). To him, a weak hadith was not false or denounced (munkar); rather, it was a category of hadith. If he found no tradition or saying to contradict it, acting upon it was more preferable than qiyas. The Imams agreed with him in prioritizing weak hadith over qiyas. As for Ahmad's choice between fiqh (jurisprudence) and hadith, his intent was not to limit oneself to merely narrating hadith without understanding and comprehending its fiqh.
Summary from Ftawy's records · added here
Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full answer on Ftawyhttps://ftawy.com/en/questions/38459
Where this answer came from
- Source platform
- Ftawy
- Original fatwa ID
- 38459
- Added here
- . This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
- Text
- Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
- Read the full ruling
- Read the full answer on Ftawy