Back to search
The question

Is a bloodwit obligatory for one who removed a woman's hymen with his finger, being ignorant of its existence, and then learned of its existence later?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Touching a non- woman is forbidden, and tampering with her major 'awrah, which led to the rupture of her hymen, is a heinous act. You must repent to Allah by abandoning the sin, regretting it, and resolving not to return to it.

Regarding the removal of the hymen: 1. If it was without her consent (whether she is of sound mind or not): You are liable for the "arsh" (compensation) for her hymen, which is a just assessment determined by trustworthy experts. 2. If it was with her consent (and she is of sound mind): You are not liable for the "arsh," but you bear the sin of the transgression. 3. If she was not of sound mind (whether with or without her consent): You are liable for the "arsh."

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
40678
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy