Back to search
The question

What is the ruling on a husband accusing his wife of not being a virgin because there was no bleeding, and is his statement to her, "I have concealed your matter because I am not certain of your virginity," considered an accusation of unchastity (qadhf)?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The absence of bleeding during marriage does not indicate the absence of the hymen. A woman's virginity should not be judged as absent based on this, and she should not be accused of adultery without legitimate conditions. As for the husband's statement: "I have covered for you due to my uncertainty about your virginity," this is not considered an accusation of slander (qadhf) unless local custom deems it so. Most likely, he means to cover up her non-virginity. The husband is advised to retain his wife as long as she is good in companionship and adheres to her religion, and to avoid words that hurt feelings.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
42554
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy