Is it true that Imam Malik considered the consensus of the people of Madinah to be a binding proof, and is it considered a binding proof for the entire Ummah?
Answer Summary:
First: Imam Malik valued the practice of the people of Madinah and considered it a proof (hujjah), owing to their unique connection with the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and the revelation and promulgation of the Quran among them. This is because they inherited a that no one else can claim.
Second: Imam Malik's intention was to refer to the practice of the people of Madinah that was akin to transmitted knowledge (naql), as well as their ancient practices from the time of the Companions. However, their practices after that era, or those they arrived at through deduction and (independent reasoning), are not considered an inviolable proof. Rather, their utmost status is to be a preponderant factor. This is the view held by meticulous Maliki scholars.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah affirms that the practice of the people of Madinah which is transmitted knowledge is a proof by the consensus of Muslims.
Summary from Ftawy's records · added here
Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full answer on Ftawyhttps://ftawy.com/en/questions/24355
Where this answer came from
- Source platform
- Ftawy
- Original fatwa ID
- 24355
- Added here
- . This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
- Text
- Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
- Read the full ruling
- Read the full answer on Ftawy