Back to search
The question

Is the first divorce that took place approximately thirty years ago, in which the husband was angry and there were no witnesses, considered a legitimate divorce or not?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

If the anger was slight and did not affect the husband's will, then his divorce is valid. However, if the anger was severe, then the divorce of an unlearned person (عامي) who did not seek a from anyone, and it later became clear that his divorce occurred in severe anger, does not take effect. He may reconcile with his wife during her waiting period () or by a new contract after its expiry. As for the student of knowledge (طالب العلم) or the seeker of a fatwa (المستفتي) who was given a fatwa that the divorce is valid, his divorce is valid, and he is not permitted to reconsider it. Deceptive measures to reconcile after the third divorce are forbidden.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
9420
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy