Back to search
The question

What is the ruling on a lawyer's work in filing lawsuits against bank clients, demanding the principal amount of the debt and its legal or conventional interest, and is it permissible to refuse that work despite having an annual contract with the bank?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The fundamental principle is that the legal profession (advocacy) is permissible, unless the lawyer undertakes a false or unlawful cause. Thus, pleading for usurious interest is invalid, because it is prohibited usury, and it contradicts the command of Allah and His Messenger concerning the prohibition of usury. Consequently, a law firm is not permitted to litigate in usurious cases, even if there is a contract obligating it to do so, for contracts that violate the law of Allah are null and void. Similarly, the firm is absolutely not permitted to contract with usurious banks, due to the assistance this entails in sin and transgression.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
81878
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy