When there is a cessation due to conflicting evidences, is the mufti's choice based on absolute trust in his knowledge and piety, or specifically within the matter at hand?
Cessation (Tawaqquf) is the act of not preferring one opinion over another due to conflicting evidence; it is for the scholar and the student of knowledge. As for the layman, when the muftis differ, he should follow the one he trusts most. If he cannot prefer one over the other, he should consult another. If that is not possible and they differ on prohibition and permissibility before an action, he should choose the side of prohibition because it is more cautious. The مكلف (legally responsible individual) must act according to the opinion that is closest to the intent of the , whether by preferring the evidence or the those who deduce the rulings. He should follow the one he trusts most in his belief in every branch of knowledge. When the muftis are equal in knowledge and piety, the way out is through caution and seeking to safeguard one's religion and honor.
Summary from Ftawy's records · added here
Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full answer on Ftawyhttps://ftawy.com/en/questions/167659
Where this answer came from
- Source platform
- Ftawy
- Original fatwa ID
- 167659
- Added here
- . This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
- Text
- Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
- Read the full ruling
- Read the full answer on Ftawy