Is it wrong to hold the general public of Western countries accountable for the offense against the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and does boycotting harm those who have no connection to the offense?
The fundamental principle is that the perpetrator is held accountable for their actions. This accountability extends to those who adopt the act, defend it, or disseminate it with malicious intent. It is not permissible to punish someone who has no connection to the act, in order to align with justice, which is the foundation of the religion of Islam. As for the economic boycott of those who insult Islam and its Prophet, it has been previously clarified: a representative may boycott if it does not result in significant harm. However, those who have already purchased these goods are not required to destroy them, as that would be a waste of money without a legitimate religious benefit, and Allah dislikes the squandering of wealth.
Summary from Ftawy's records · added here
Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full answer on Ftawyhttps://ftawy.com/en/questions/73457
Where this answer came from
- Source platform
- Ftawy
- Original fatwa ID
- 73457
- Added here
- . This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
- Text
- Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
- Read the full ruling
- Read the full answer on Ftawy