Back to search
The question

Is it true that the succession of Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq was not by consensus, due to the non-participation of Ali and his companions in it?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Neither Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) nor any other companion denied Abu Bakr's priority to the Caliphate. He pledged allegiance to him twice: The first was on the day of Saqifah, where Umar, the Muhajireen, and the Ansar all pledged allegiance to him. Then, Zubair and Ali pledged allegiance after Abu Bakr called upon them. The second pledge of allegiance occurred after the passing of Fatimah (may Allah be pleased with her), when Ali sought reconciliation with Abu Bakr and pledged allegiance to him, after having observed the people's disapproval. Ibn Kathir emphasized that the second pledge of allegiance confirmed the first, and that Ali was not estranged from Abu Bakr during the six months between the two pledges. Rather, he prayed behind him and attended his gatherings for consultation. The Companions unanimously agreed on the superiority of Al-Siddiq and his rightful claim to the Caliphate.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
144820
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy