Back to search
The question

Am I entitled to demand the sum from (S) that (P) pledged to pay on behalf of (C), and was I wrong in taking the oath in the stated form, and what is the ruling on that?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The one who arbitrates disputes is the judge or the Sharia arbitrator. It appears that (S) committed to settling your debts as a guarantor, and therefore he is obligated to pay. Guaranty is legally binding according to the Quran, , and scholarly consensus (Ijma').

If (S)'s commitment was a promise, then he must fulfill it, especially if the promise caused harm to the promisee. If he does not fulfill it, he should be asked either to implement the promise or to compensate for the damage. There is no harm in you taking an oath and demanding (S) to fulfill his obligation.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
97228
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy