Back to search
The question

What is the ruling regarding the husband's statement, "My life is forbidden to me," without intending divorce, and his statement, "If you want to remain under my care, get out of my sight," followed by the wife's return? What is the ruling regarding situations where there is no explicit wording or intention of divorce? Is the wife sinful? And how can she ascertain her husband's intention?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

If a husband tells his wife, "You are unlawful to me" (عليّ الحرام) without intending divorce, his wife is not divorced. He is, however, obligated to pay an expiation for ẓihār or an expiation for an oath, depending on his intention.

As for the husband's statement, "If you want to remain under my marital bond...", this does not constitute a divorce, as it is neither an explicit statement of divorce nor an ambiguous one (kināyah). What matters regarding the husband's intention is his own declaration, as he knows his intention best.

The wife is obligated to obey her husband in what he commands her to do, as long as it is within what is considered good and lawful (maʿrūf).

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
148724
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy