Back to search
The question

Is retaining an unused "Mubarak Housing for Youth" apartment, and falsely claiming ownership of it to avoid returning it to the New Urban Communities Authority, considered taking what is not rightfully mine from a religious perspective?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

If the state subsidizes apartments and stipulates their occupancy for low-income individuals, then ownership is not permissible except for those who meet the conditions, based on the : "Muslims are bound by their conditions in what is permissible." Accordingly, your brother's ownership of the apartment is not valid due to his not residing in it, and your purchase of it from him is not permissible. It is obligatory to return it to the authority. However, if the state does not subsidize the apartments and does not impose conditions, then your ownership of it is valid, and you may dispose of it, and it is permissible to lie to protect your right to it.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
63998
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy