Does a conditional divorce, stated in the form: "If you enter my Facebook page, thinking that I am chatting with girls, and that is not the case, then you are divorced; but if that is the case, i.e., I was chatting, then you are not divorced," and I told her that this condition lasts until the Day of Judgment, meaning whenever she enters my page and does not find chats with girls, she is considered divorced, take effect in the following situations: 1. If the wife entered the page without thinking that there were chats? 2. If there were previous chats with girls that were deleted or closed and the wife did not find them? 3. If the wife found a message from a girl who is not among the friends and it had not been replied to? 4. Does the divorce take effect merely by the husband telling his family, her family, and her that the divorce has occurred, based on his assumption that it did, knowing that he did not himself initiate the divorce? 5. Does the wife's entry after deleting the account and creating a new one, while thinking that there are chats, trigger the divorce?
Informing the wife of a divorce occurring based on the husband's assumption does not make it occur. Her accessing his Facebook account does not make it occur if the oath was restricted to her not doubting his entry into chat. However, if she repeatedly accesses it and finds no chat, the divorce occurs due to the repetition of the condition.
Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · reviewed Sep 2, 2026
Read the full answer on Ftawyhttps://ftawy.com/en/questions/151543