What is the ruling on fictitious tenders in the following two cases: Firstly, when a company is asked to provide two fictitious bids after it has agreed with the client on the price and service, such that there is no harm to other companies? Secondly, when an institution requests fictitious bids to deal with a specific company due to its good reputation, not for bribery or favoritism?

Such laws and regulations governing the tendering process are intended to serve two interests:

1. A specific interest of the company owning the project, by fostering competition in quality, cost, and execution time.

2. A general interest, by creating job opportunities for competing companies.

Fictitious tenders harm the company owning the project, depriving it of the opportunity to find better offers. They also involve lying, Najsh (fraudulent bidding), deception of the approving committee, and clear misleading of it.

The institution concerned with the project must adhere to such administrative laws and regulations governing the work.