Why did Imam Ibn al-Qayyim not discuss the concept of balāʾ (trial/affliction) in the context of sodomy, and why did he only indirectly mention the difference between inclination and action? And does the balāʾ remain a balāʾ even after engaging in sodomy, or does its reward cease with the commission of the sin? And what about the social stigma resulting from ignorance, and does removing this stigma conflict with religion?

The questioner is advised to seek treatment for this abomination and consult specialists, and not to ask too many questions in this regard. Furthermore, the claim that Imam Ibn al-Qayyim did not discuss the concept of trial (بلا) in sodomy is false. Ibn al-Qayyim did indeed address this concept, clarifying the enormity and danger of this abomination, and that its punishment is great in this world and the hereafter. At the same time, he explained the possibility of repenting from it and erasing its sins if the repentance is sincere and true. Finally, we apologize for not answering the remaining questions because, as mentioned, they will not benefit the questioner in justifying his deed, and because the question contained more than one question, which violates the website's policy for receiving questions.