Back to search

What is the response to someone who claims that the noble verse: "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And good women are for good men, and good men are for good women. Those [good people] are innocent of what the accusers say. For them is forgiveness and noble provision" (24:26) is not applicable in reality, citing the wives of Prophet Lot and Pharaoh as evidence?

1 min readAlso available in العربية

The exegetes differed regarding the meaning of the verse. Some of them are of the view that "al-khabīthāt" (the evil things/words/deeds) are the bad sayings and actions that emanate from "al-khabīthīn" (the evil ones) among people, and that "al-ṭayyibāt" (the good things/words/deeds) are the good sayings and actions that emanate from "al-ṭayyibīn" (the good ones).

Others are of the view that the verse speaks about individuals: so, evil women are for evil men, and evil men are for evil women; and good women are for good men, and good men are for good women.

Ibn Jarir al-Tabari chose the first meaning, saying: "The most appropriate of these interpretations for the verse is the saying of those who said: 'al-khabīthāt' refers to evil speech, meaning its ugliness and badness, for the evil ones among men and women; and the evil ones among people are for evil speech, they are more deserving of it, because they are its people. And 'al-ṭayyibāt' refers to good speech, meaning its beauty and excellence, for the good ones among people; and the good ones among people are for good speech, because they are its people and more deserving of it."

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · reviewed Sep 2, 2026

Read the full answer on Ftawy