Shart

Letter S · Updated Sep 5, 2026

In plain terms

Shart names something required for an act to count, standing outside the act itself rather than forming one of its essential parts.

What it means for me: Shart tells you what has to be true before or during an act for it to count. Missing one does not mean a part is missing from the act itself, only that a requirement was not met.

Example: A scholar says, 'reaching a set age is a shart for this duty, not a rukn of it.' The listener understands: without it, the duty is not yet binding, though the act itself would have no missing part.

Do not confuse with: Rukn, pillar. A missing rukn means part of the act itself is gone. A missing shart means the act cannot yet take effect, even though its parts are complete.

If scholars differ: Legal theorists commonly divide conditions into three kinds: of obligation, of validity, and of completeness. Jurists can differ on whether a specific requirement is a shart, a rukn, or merely recommended. This distinction is discussed further in know the ruling before you sign.

See the term in context

Questions that use it