Recitation and Tajweed
851 questions
How authentic and what is the meaning of the Hadith: "Indeed, it is out of veneration for Allah Almighty to honor the elderly Muslim, and the bearer of the Qur'an who does not go to extremes with it nor abandons it, and to honor the just ruler"?
Do rawm and ishmam apply to idgham al-kabeer when reading al-Susi, while making the first letter sakin, both when pausing and continuing?
Does the reward mentioned in the Qur'an, "For every letter a good deed, and a good deed is multiplied tenfold," include everyone who reads the Qur'an, regardless of their intentions, such as memorization, revision, recitation, and citing verses, and does this include the Basmalah alone?
Does the recitation of the six verses of healing mentioned imply healing from any disease, or does it have another meaning?
Is it understood from the saying "you read it while asleep and awake" in the Hadith that it is permissible to read the Quran silently without moving the tongue?
Does Asim from Zirr ibn Hubaysh, or only Al-Sulami, enter into the turuq and asaneed of Al-Shatibiyyah in the riwayah of Hafs from Asim? And do Uthman, Zayd, and Ubayy enter into it, or only Ali, may Allah be pleased with them?
Is it permissible, while reciting, to read what is easy from a surah, such as reading only three verses from a surah you are still learning, until you master the entire surah?
What is the ruling on saying "Amen" after reciting Surat Al-Fatihah outside of prayer?
What is the ruling on reciting the Qur’an outside of prayer without the Basmalah?
What is the ruling regarding someone who says to his wife: "I cannot bear to hear the Qur'an recited with the voices of Saudis and Iraqis, and this is not Qur'an"?
How did some scholars deduce that ritual purity is not a prerequisite for the prostration of recitation (Sujud al-Tilawah), based on the prostration of Muslims and polytheists when the Prophet (peace be upon him) recited Surat An-Najm, even though the story is Makkan and it is possible that this was specific to prayer, or does the omission of detailed inquiry in a context of probability equate to a general statement?