Back to search
The question

What is the ruling regarding a man's statement to his wife in a moment of anger: "You are divorced if anything happens to your belly," or "You are divorced if anything happens to that which is in your belly," knowing that his intention was to scare her?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Anger that does not completely remove one's senses does not prevent a divorce from occurring. A conditional divorce, dependent on a condition, takes effect when that condition is met. This is the view of the majority of scholars. However, Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah held that a conditional divorce intended as a threat does not take effect, and instead, an expiation for breaking an oath is required. Therefore, if you broke your oath, your wife is divorced. If this divorce does not complete the three divorces, you may take her back during her waiting period ('). Intention in an oath specifies the general wording. If you intended to make the divorce conditional on intentional abortion, then you have not broken your oath if the miscarriage occurred unintentionally. We should note that abortion is not permissible unless the continuation of the fetus's presence poses a danger to the mother's life.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
194818
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy